Home Forums Movies Oscars going Spineless (Hostless)

Oscars going Spineless (Hostless)


CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
Created
2 weeks ago
Last Reply
2 weeks ago
18
replies
1029
views
15
users
ProfessorChaos
3
O´Hara
2
ospencer
1
  • ProfessorChaos
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 10th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727596

    Get ready for video clips & sketches 🙄

    After Kevin Hart Debacle, Oscars Forge Ahead Hostless
    By MATT DONNELLY

    The Oscars are poised to embark on one of the most radical reinventions in the awards show’s long history. For the first time in nearly three decades, the biggest night in movies plans to go without a host, individuals with knowledge of the plans told Variety.

    Producers will select a crop of A-listers to introduce various segments instead of relying on one marquee name to kick things off in a monologue filled with Trump zingers, said the insiders. The producers and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the group behind the Oscars, are scrambling to line up top talent needed to carry the telecast, which is just six weeks from airing live — on Feb. 24 — from Hollywood’s Dolby Theatre. Hand-wringing at the Academy has been palpable.

    As it stands, no new offers are out, nor are any expected to be made to a single potential host to fill the void left by Kevin Hart, who dropped out within hours of being selected when he refused to apologize for his past homophobic remarks that had resurfaced on Twitter.

    Barring an eleventh-hour pivot by the Academy — in the event that a superstar host materializes — the show producers are moving forward with a broadcast that will focus on starry skits and play up a high-profile year for music in film, thanks to likely nominees Lady Gaga, Dolly Parton, and Kendrick Lamar, one individual involved with the show said.

    The idea that Hart might be brought back to host is 100% dead, according to sources close to the matter. Hart said as much during a Wednesday sit-down on “Good Morning America,” during which he emphatically stated that he would not emcee the broadcast.

    “I’m not hosting the Oscars this year,” said Hart. When asked if he will host in the future he said, “It’s hard to predict what can happen.”

    The Academy had been considering welcoming Hart back if he had used the opportunity in an interview with Ellen DeGeneres to demonstrate contrition for his anti-gay jokes and recommit to hosting the show. But his sit-down with DeGeneres, a sympathetic friend, backfired when he was made out to be the victim of internet trolls and “haters” rather than the perpetrator of hateful remarks.

    Scathing reactions from LGBTQ groups and others on Twitter and Facebook made it clear that Hart should not be allowed to return as host and would be a distraction from the big event. Moreover, the Academy, according to sources, was furious that DeGeneres, on her show, mischaracterized her phone conversation with an unnamed Academy official whom she contacted to lobby for Hart’s reinstatement.

    DeGeneres implied that the Academy wanted Hart back at all costs, to the point of quoting someone in the ranks admitting the organization may have “said the wrong thing” in discussing Hart’s exit.

    While the Academy never commented on the veracity of the call, or whom it may have been with, one person said DeGeneres took the remarks out of context. A rep for DeGeneres had no comment.

    An Academy spokesperson would not remark on the status of the host position or the new format of the live show.

    Since his botched “Ellen” appearance, Hart has continued to double down on his unwillingness to engage in meaningful discussions with an unhappy LGBTQ community. As recently as Jan. 7, on his SiriusXM satellite show, he said it was not his “life’s dream” to be an ally to the queer community. Back-channel attempts to mitigate fallout through avenues like his agency, UTA, have been unsuccessful, an insider familiar with conversations with his team said. Hart remains “the brick wall” where discourse stops, that individual said.

    The concept of a hostless Oscars is divisive, to say the least. Executives were heard bemoaning the idea on the Golden Globes after-party circuit. One top media boss found the prospect potentially fatal, noting that hosts are often the biggest draw for such splashy live TV events.

    A partner-level talent agent concurred, saying he was less interested in Hart’s downfall, but wondered who would watch the show without a famous face as conductor to keep the trains running?

    Then there are those who suggest that going without a host may prove to be a positive.

    “Why not give it a shot? Things are so polarized anyway, any host that says anything will be analyzed to death,” suggested media consultant Brad Adgate. “No host might be an experiment, and, let’s face it, the days of Bob Hope and Billy Crystal hosting are over,” Adgate told Variety.

    The Oscar telecast has gone without a single host precisely once, 30 years ago. That broadcast lives in infamy: Producer Allan Carr and director Jeff Margolis mounted an 11-minute musical number to open the show in lieu of a host monologue. The opening gave us Rob Lowe’s version of “Proud Mary,” a duet with Snow White. Lowe is still trying to live it down.

    There have also been years with a crowded slate of names sharing the duties, as in 1958, when Bob Hope, Jack Lemmon, Rosalind Russell and Donald Duck (yup) were among those named as hosts. In 1973, Carol Burnett, Michael Caine, Charlton Heston and Rock Hudson all split the gig. The last time more than three people hosted was 1987, when Chevy Chase, Goldie Hawn and Paul “Crocodile Dundee” Hogan took the stage. The last time more than one person hosted was 2011, the year of James Franco and Anne Hathaway. We all remember how that went.

    Oscars producer Donna Gigliotti is also looking at ways to trim a show that has been accused of being interminable and bloated, insiders said. That may entail shaking up the usual monotonous stream of presenters calling up winners, though how exactly Gigliotti and team will tinker with that remains to be seen.

    The good news, people familiar with Gigliotti’s plans said, is that key changes to this year’s ceremony have minimized the role of the host anyway. The new style and pacing of presenters will require less time from an emcee, one of the sources said.

    That’s pretty convenient for a production mired in this much controversy and uncertainty, but the Academy did lay the groundwork for an overhaul in a slew of changes announced last summer (among them: a definitive shortening of the show to three hours and the removal of lesser-known awards categories — think editing and sound — from the live show, instead being aired in a clip package near the end of the broadcast).

    “The people who produce that show are hogtied by the Academy, who as a group are not willing to change very much. It’s hard to know how anyone in my community can really contribute,” one prolific awards show and live events producer told Variety, speaking on condition of anonymity.

    The producer did not share the same fears as some over an Oscarcast without an emcee, saying that in recent years, awards programs in general have fixated too much on the role of host.

    “When you make these shows, you are beholden to the race. If it’s a great race, it’s a great show. If it’s not a great show, you’re hanging a lot on that host and they’re not going to save you. They’ll give a few good moments,” the producer said.

    Moments will be important. Questions about the quality and relevance of the Oscars bubbled up after last year’s ratings delivered an all-time low, a drop of nearly 19% year over year to 26.5 million viewers.

    Even Rob Lowe’s mortifying “Snow White” Oscar moment was watched by 42.6 million people when it aired 30 years ago.

    Reply
    ospencer
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 9th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727598

    This is a mistake

    ReplyCopy URL
    ProfessorChaos
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 10th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727600

    The Academy could’ve brought in a host/comedian who, though not an A-List name, but came from an under-represented group. We could’ve had a great host, from the Female, LGTBQ, Latino, Asian, Middle-Eastern, African-American or other vibrant communities. It could’ve been a Star-making step forward! Don’t buy the “no one wanted to host” excuse. That’s only true of the A-Listers. Oscar had a chance the steer the ship forward, but chose to cower in fear instead. Low ratings will be their reward

    ReplyCopy URL
    Kubrick
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 9th, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727605

    What’s the worst that could happen? The first twenty minutes are not spent pandering to the audience in the front row and aisle seats? I think this will work just fine. Besides, any host disappears after ninety minutes because the show is running long, and you rarely see them again until the final sixty seconds of the telecast after Best Picture.

     

    ReplyCopy URL
    O´Hara
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 11th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727616

    Great

    ReplyCopy URL
    Atypical
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 1st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727628

    That’s fine. A music-heavy show at least means all five Original Song nominees will get to perform, and depending on the relevance of the montages, “A-list” presenters, and all the acting clips, it’s worthy enough to give it a go. They have their work cut out for them with the advertising though. If the blockbusters are snubbed for BP, the ratings will plummet sharply yet again for the telecast.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Sean Phillips
    Participant
    Joined:
    Apr 4th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727643

    The Golden Globes didn’t have a host for years and it was always fine. I’m for this.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Miles
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 22nd, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727685

    I’m fine with no host. I just hope this doesn’t mean this doesn’t mean more presenter bits as filler.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Eden
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 7th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727695

    I’ll repeat my idea I posted here a while ago. Have last year’s four acting winners start the show in a few short minutes and then have other presenters. The four will also present the categories they’ve won.

    I don’t hate the idea, but I think the producers feel like they have to add new stuff just to replace the time which would’ve been used by the host. You don’t. No one’s dying to see someone giving sandwiches to celebrities. Instead, have every category aired live and let every song nominee perform. No need for boring sketches and clips.

    ReplyCopy URL
    ProfessorChaos
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 10th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727702

    No need for boring sketches and clips.

    Which is exactly what they’re doing:

    the show producers are moving forward with a broadcast that will focus on starry skits and play up a high-profile year for music in film

    Get ready for 5 minute montages so A Star is Born & Bohemian Rhapsody can be highlighted alongside The Rose, The Doors, Crazy Heart, Purple Rain, Ray, Walk the Line & Get Him to the Greek.

    Oh and if Black Panther is nominated for Best Picture, count on the superhero montage.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Chris Beachum
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    May 22nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727733

    Queen with Adam Lambert should open the show. That would get things off to a rousing start.

    ReplyCopy URL
    O´Hara
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 11th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727740

    Queen with Adam Lambert should open the show. That would get things off to a rousing start.

    Will we get to predict BAFTAS?

    ReplyCopy URL
    BICTH
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 3rd, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727744

    I’d love to see gaga perform why did you do that just for the sheer camp value of it all

    ReplyCopy URL
    Jazzy
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 3rd, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727765

    Wonderful!!!!! Last year’s show was dubbed “#OscarsSoBoring” and Jimmy Kimmel was said to be unfunny. So, a host-free telecast sounds like a great idea to me.

    ReplyCopy URL
    kellis
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 30th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202727769

    Was it really necessary to make a third thread about this?

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
Jeffrey... - Jan 21, 2019
Movies
Manuel ... - Jan 21, 2019
Movies
Guest 2018 - Jan 21, 2019
Movies